Itís Official: Japan Joins 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention

Japan ratifies Hague Child Abduction Convention; diplomacy key to curing global abduction epidemic.

Online PR News – 25-January-2014 – Los Angeles, CA – Today in Tokyo, the Government of Japan approved ratification of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention; a few hours later, the Japanese Ambassador to the Netherlands, Mr. Masaru Tsuji, deposited the instrument of ratification, making Japan the 91st Contracting State to this important treaty. This significant development reaffirms that diplomatic efforts among the international community, together with the invaluable assistance provided by the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, are working; it also reaffirms that the Hague Child Abduction Convention is the proper mechanism for all governments and families around the world to utilize in order to settle international child abduction disputes.

Japanís ratification of the Convention comes after long-standing multi-lateral diplomatic efforts combined with global public outcry over Japanís previous failure to participate in the international child abduction treaty and to offer victimized children and targeted parents of abduction a vehicle to turn to in order to resolve international parental child abduction disputes.

The 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention will enter into force for Japan on April 1st, 2014. Under Japanís participation, foreign parents who have previously had a child internationally abducted to Japan are not eligible to file a Hague Application or utilize the treaty. Retroactivity remains a concern for hundreds of left-behind parents still seeking to reunite with their kidnapped children.

The 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention seeks to combat parental child abduction by providing a system of co-operation between Contracting States and a rapid procedure for the return of the child to the country of the childís habitual residence. Judges overseeing litigation revolving around the1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention are not to determine issues of custody as that issue typically falls under the jurisdiction of the courts located in the childís country of habitual residency.

Japanís ratification of the convention demonstrates that international diplomacy and education continues to work, while also creating a stronger atmosphere for other countries that are not participants to the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention, such as India, to strongly consider ratification.

In the past, Japan has been considered a Ďblack holeí for international parental child abductors as the overwhelming number of children abducted to Japan by a Japanese national living abroad have not been returned to the childís country of original jurisdiction.

The vast majority of left-behind parents are fathers residing in Europe and North America. Tragically, the targeted parent often has little or no rights of access or custody to their child once the child lands in Japan due to the countryís antiquated and prejudicial family law policies that tend to grant a childís mother sole custody of the child while simultaneously removing the childís fatherís access to the child. Japanís legal system does not recognize the concept of joint-custody.

In May 2013, the Diet had approved Japanís compliance to the treaty, sending out a clear indicator that the country was steadily moving toward participation. Until today, Japan was the only country in the Group of Eight (G8) that has not affirmed the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.

The following month (June) Japanís Parliament enacted a law stipulating domestic implementation procedures for the Hague child abduction treaty.

Japanís Parliament established procedures requiring the country to create a Central Authority under the auspices of the Foreign Ministry. The Central Authorityís responsibilities include the tasks of locating children who have been abducted and encourage families involved in international parental child abduction claims to settle disputes through consultations.

If the consultations fail, family courts in Tokyo and Osaka specifically trained in 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention matters will decide on matters. The Central Authority will be staffed with legal experts in international private law as well child psychologist and domestic violence counselors. A third Hague Court location could later be added.

Under the terms of Japanís Parliamentary action in June, 2013 the new law provides grounds for refusal to return a child if abuse or domestic violence is feared, issues that are expected to draw keen interest in light of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Conventionís Article 13, a provision that is almost always utilized by parental child abductors regardless of the gender of the abductor.

Peter Thomas Senese, Executive Director of The I CARE Foundation comments: ďToday is a great day for children who may be targeted in the future for international parental child abduction to Japan and elsewhere. Clearly, diplomatic efforts have accomplished a great deal for the future of children: let us hope that the outstanding Hague Permanent Bureau leadership continues diplomatic efforts to compel other non-contracting countries to participate in this critical international treaty that was created to protect the very fabric of the world: our children. It is also critical to say that we must not forget the children presently detained in Japan to which Japanís annexation of the convention does not address. In the spirit of the convention, Japanese lawmakers and policymakers must now complete their participation at the table of nations by addressing the abductions of hundreds of children presently detained in Japan. As child abduction prevention advocates thankfully acknowledge Japanís ascent, we must now turn our attention to India, China, and many other non-contracting countries. And with utmost importance we must begin placing and planning for elevated education and training so compliance with the convention will no longer be a painful issue for some left behind parents. Diplomacy works. Today this notion is in clear display.Ē

Child abduction prevention advocates from around the world hope that Japanís ratification of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention will further push non-Hague countries including India, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the Philippines, and China (mainland) who are all believed to be actively assessing the Convention with a view to becoming a party to.

Today Japan has taken its place at the table of nations and finally a stand against the atrocity of international parental child abduction and severe abuse against targeted children and their families. As Japan works to uphold the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention we must first and foremost not forget the children who have been abducted to Japan and their left-behind families, many whom successfully advocated for Japanís ratification of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.

To read the official comments shared by The Hague Permanent Bureau concerning diplomacy and Japanís ratification follow this link: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=events.details&year=2014&varevent=344

Bookmarkse-mailGoogledel.icio.usStumbleUponSlashdotFurlDiggTechnoratiYahooMyWebBlinkListSpurlRawSugarWists
 
 
Contact Information
Maria Gina
I CARE Foundation

3104972683